| Summary: Presents findings from a study exploring perceptions of appropriate communication in the context of investigative interviews and cross-examination of children. Participants (10 intermediaries and 12 lawyers) examined transcripts of mock investigative interviews and cross-examination of a child and noted which, if any, phrases seemed inappropriate and suggested how they could be amended. Qualitative analysis showed that both groups (intermediaries and lawyers) demonstrated awareness of the emotional and developmental needs of the child but there was a lack of understanding about some aspects of interviewing guidance, particularly in respect to the definition of leading questions. |
