Needs of older children in care forgotten, Barnardo’s chief claims

Older children in care risk being overlooked for adoption because of a focus on finding placements for babies and younger children, the charity Barnardo’s has warned.

According to the latest government statistics, almost 12,000 – or 43 per cent – of all children who entered care in England last year were aged between 10 and 17. Of those children, 80 per cent were taken into care for the first time.

Barnardo’s argued that finding adoptive families for these children is becoming increasingly difficult.

This is partly because of the emphasis on placing babies for adoption, but also because of a general shortage of foster families across the UK. The charity estimates that at least 8,750 new foster families will need to be recruited within the next 12 months.

Barnardo’s chief executive Anne Marie Carrie said the needs of older children are being forgotten.

“All children deserve a loving home and older children need looking after just as much as infants and babies in order to thrive,” she said. “We urgently need more people to consider becoming foster parents to children over the age of 10.

“We know from our experience that older children in care can need extra support. They need carers who can help them overcome emotional and behavioural difficulties, and provide much needed stability.

“We have seen many of the older children we work with blossom into healthy, happy, adults after being placed with the right foster family. Which is why I want to encourage more people to open their homes and their hearts to help to transform an older child’s life”.

Dee and George Collins have fostered three teenage girls over the past three years. Dee said: “Before I became a foster carer I didn’t realise how much support children need. But it didn’t faze me and I learned a lot from the first child I cared for. You realise that what you can do for these children can make a big impact on their lives.”

Source: CYP Now

Loss of legal aid spells disaster for parent-child contact, lawyers warn

Family lawyers are warning that parents risk losing contact with their children because of reforms to legal aid, ahead of further scrutiny of the legislation in the House of Lords

According to a snapshot survey by Resolution, the association representing 6,000 family lawyers, less than a quarter of families that currently qualify for legal aid will be able to access subsidised legal support if the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill is passed.

The survey of 267 family lawyers found that 57 per cent believe a parent risks losing contact with their child in at least half of their cases – a total 4,348 from the snapshot sample alone.

A further 41 per cent of members said their current legal aid cases would be unsuitable for mediation, partly as a result of domestic violence, drug or alcohol problems or mental health issues.

David Allison, chair of Resolution, said: “It is clear that the government’s proposed legal aid cuts could bring devastating consequences. Many of those currently eligible for legal aid would seriously struggle to obtain the legal advice and support that could ensure they continue to see their children after a difficult separation.

“The changes also risk increasing the nation’s benefits bill. Many of our members say that the majority of their clients would not know what financial settlement they are entitled to, which could see them left dependent on the welfare state and benefits.

“Resolution welcomes the government’s desire to see fewer family cases going through the court system. However, there needs to be support for those for whom mediation is inappropriate, which, according to the survey, could be in as many as 40 per cent of cases.”

On average, the 267 family lawyers who responded to the survey worked on 51 cases, representing 15,000 children in total.

Further results reveal that more than half of respondents, 55 per cent, would do less private family legal work – 31 per cent for public family legal aid.

Source: CYP Now

Ofsted tightens training requirement for registered childminders

Childminders will be required to undertake relevant training before applying to the childcare register under proposals for Ofsted’s revised early years inspection and registration regime

In light of the recommendations set out in the review of the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS), Ofsted has published its consultation on changes to how it will register and inspect settings including nurseries and childminders.

The consultation sets out the inspectorate’s aspiration to allow registered providers more autonomy in managing services and focus attention on progress in children’s learning and development.

Currently, childminders can be accepted onto the register without relevant experience, but are required to undertake training within six months of registration, but Ofsted’s proposals seek to change this.

Jean Humphrys, Ofsted’s director of education and care, said: “Removing unnecessary regulation and bureaucracy is important to providers. Ofsted is aiming to find the right level of enforcement to ensure that children are safe and well cared for. Our overriding ambition it to ensure that every child has the best possible start in life.

“The changes we are proposing provide a balance. They will reassure parents that our systems and processes for regulating early years and childcare providers are robust, preventing unsuitable people from having access to children, while simplifying inspection for those providing care.”

Other changes include the way concerns are investigated. Under the proposals, the watchdog will carry out a full inspection and publish the report on its website if it receives information that raises concerns about the setting, in an attempt to offer greater transparency to parents.

On all other inspections, Ofsted proposes to continue visiting each setting once in every 47-month period. Unnanounced inspections for most group provision will also remain and childminders and holiday playschemes will be called no more than five days in advance of an inspection.

Ofsted is encouraging all those with an interest in early years, including parents and carers, to respond to the consultation before 6 April.

Source: CYP NOW

Child poverty hotspots revealed

At least four in 10 children are living in poverty in 19 parliamentary constituencies in the UK, latest figures show

The statistics, which present the child poverty landscape in mid-2011, have been released by the Campaign to End Child Poverty, which has mapped child poverty across the whole of the UK.

Constituencies with the highest levels of child poverty include Bethnal Green and Bow (51 per cent), Manchester Central (49 per cent), Poplar and Canning Town (48 per cent) and Belfast West (46 per cent).

A more localised breakdown reveals that in 100 wards throughout the UK, the majority of children remain in poverty.

At the other end of the spectrum the report reveals that 89 constituencies already meet the government’s headline target for 2020 by having child poverty rates of 10 per cent or lower.

Publication of the map comes after the Institute for Fiscal Studies last week estimated that half a million more children will fall into poverty within the next three years.

The Campaign to End Child Poverty, made up of more than 150 organisations including children’s charities and child welfare organisations, is calling on government to rebalance its deficit reduction measures so that the burden does not fall unfairly on families with low incomes.

It is also calling on government to set out clearly the reductions in child poverty they expect to achieve from the child poverty strategy published in April 2011.

Alison Garnham, executive director of the campaign, said: “The child poverty map paints a stark picture of a socially segregated Britain where the life chances of millions of children are damaged by poverty and inequality.

“But it also gives us reason for hope. The child poverty target has already been met in the Prime Minister’s constituency (Witney) and nearly 100 others, so never let it be said that the targets are impossible to meet.

“If we can do it in Witney today, we can do it in Hackney tomorrow.”

Garnham warned that “targeting cuts on families” will prove “an economic and social disaster”, with businesses losing billions of pounds of demand and families struggling to keep their children clothed, fed and warm.

“The government urgently needs a serious plan to stop the rise in unemployment and to create jobs so that young people and parents can get out of the dole queue and into the workplace,” she said.

“We need a plan to target investment through the family purse to stimulate the economy, so that shops, services and businesses get the customers they need to stay afloat and recruit staff.”

Anne Longfield, chief executive of charity 4Children, said arguments by politicians over how child poverty should be measured are not helping the situation.

“We should not accept child poverty as a fact of life,” she said. “Despite the coalition’s praise for Frank Field’s report on child poverty and David Cameron and Nick Clegg’s commitment to tackling the issue, the fight to improve the lives of millions of children has been stymied by a debate between politicians preoccupied by the relative merits of different ways of measuring how poor children are.

“Instead we should be redoubling our efforts on all fronts to lift children out of poverty.

Source: CYP NOW

Distribution of early intervention grant sparks concerns

Fairness in the distribution of the early intervention grant has been called into question after it emerged that many deprived areas have fared worse than those that are better off

Analysis by CYP Now found that despite the apparent six per cent overall rise in the early intervention grant – from £2.232bn in 2011/12 to £2.365bn in 2012/13, an increase of £133.2m – authorities will be expected to use a combined £291m of the cash to prepare for the extension of free nursery care to 40 per cent of two-year-olds, announced by Chancellor George Osborne in November.

In addition, stark differences were found over the way the grant will be divvied up between councils, with Conservative authorities appearing to fare better than Labour councils.

At the other end of the spectrum, Surrey, Redbridge, Kingston Upon Thames, Buckinghamshire, West Berkshire, Wokingham, Harrow, Barnet, Richmond Upon Thames and Wandsworth will all receive above average increases of more than 9.5 per cent.

Of these authorities, five rank in the top 10 for child wellbeing

Source: CYP Now